Skip to content

Intelligence report 03

Study Budgeting

A structured cost estimate by cost type, with scenarios and the cost of each month of delay.

Format
Written report and walkthrough
Available for
Neurodegenerative diseases, Type 1 diabetes
Evidence
Every figure sourced and graded A to D

About this sample. This page shows the method and structure of the report. It contains no client data; every engagement is prepared for the specific study and indication.

1Overview

A bottom-up estimate of study cost built from a documented cost library. Every line states its cost type, quantity, rate and evidence grade, so totals can be traced, compared across scenarios and reconciled with external proposals.

2Questions this report answers

  • ?What should the study cost, split by cost type and category?
  • ?How strongly do the number of sites and enrollment drive the total?
  • ?What does each month of delay add to the budget?
  • ?How do CRO or site proposals compare with an independent estimate?

3Protocol

The report follows the same documented sequence for every study. Each step produces an output that is kept in the final report.

  1. 1

    Study parameters

    Sites, enrollment, duration and the schedule of assessments are taken from the protocol and confirmed with you.

    Output: Parameter sheet

  2. 2

    Cost structure

    Every cost is classified as per-site, per-patient, fixed or time-dependent, so it scales correctly with the study design.

    Output: Cost structure

  3. 3

    Rate assignment

    Rates are taken from the cost library for the indication, each with its basis and evidence grade.

    Output: Costed line items

  4. 4

    Scenarios

    Low, base and high scenarios are built from the same structure so differences can be read line by line.

    Output: Scenario comparison

  5. 5

    Cost of delay

    The extra cost of each delayed month is calculated from the monthly running cost and extension management.

    Output: Delay cost

  6. 6

    Proposal reconciliation

    If provided, CRO or site proposals are mapped to the same structure and compared line by line.

    Output: Gap analysis

4Report contents

SectionTitle
1Executive summaryTotal by scenario and the main cost drivers.
2Budget by cost typePer-site, per-patient, fixed and monthly costs.
3Budget by categoryTotals by cost category across the study.
4Scenario comparisonLow, base and high side by side.
5Cost of delayAdditional cost for each month beyond plan.
6Proposal comparisonDifferences against external proposals, where provided.

5Evidence standards

Every figure in the report carries its source, its date and one of four evidence grades, so you can see what is confirmed and what is assumed.

A

Confirmed

Reported directly by an authoritative source.

B

Documented

Published or documented, with a clear method.

C

Estimated

Derived by Clinovia from graded inputs.

D

Assumed

An explicit assumption, open to review.

6Inputs and deliverables

What we need from you

  • Protocol synopsis and schedule of assessments
  • Planned sites, enrollment and duration
  • CRO or site proposals, optional

What you receive

  • Written report (PDF)
  • Budget model (Excel)
  • Walkthrough session with your team

Discuss this report for your study

Tell us about the indication and the decision in front of you. A pilot on a single study is a good place to start.

Other intelligence reports